No, of course not –the guru, per se, doesn’t exist in Zen. Zen has teachers of course, but the distinction is an important one, especially in Tibetan Buddhist tantra, where “one’s teacher is seen as inseparable from the meditational deity and the Three Jewels of Refuge.” (That definition comes from the glossary in Introduction to Tantra, by Lama Yeshe.) Now, being that Chopra is spiritually concerned in a sometimes specific, sometimes dharmic way (and has written about the Buddha in long-prose and comic forms), it’s not surprising that some might get confused. But Tina Brown’s Daily Beast has in fact called him a “Zen guru,” in this report:
Chelsea Clinton wasn’t the only famous female making it official this weekend: Powerhouse songstress Alicia Keys and her main squeeze, producer Swizz Beatz (aka Kasseem Dean), exchanged vows in an intimate ceremony presided over by Zen guru Deepak Chopra.
And it should be said that Chopra has no specific credentials related to the Zen Buddhist school.
Not that big a deal, granted, but no wonder there’s so much confusion about what Buddhism is or isn’t. Often the media likes to, as Steve Martin said, “make up facts.”
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
August 3rd, 2010 at 7:03 am
Wow….that is like saying the Pope is the head Rabbi in Isreal. Chopra is barely Buddhist, let alone Zen.
August 4th, 2010 at 1:13 pm
I’m wondering if you would be interested in receiving a review copy of Brad Warner’s upcoming SEX, SIN, and ZEN for possible review, mention, or excerpt on your blog!? If so, please email me your mailing address to kim at newworldlibrary dot com and we’ll add you to the list!
August 6th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
you already sent it to me, Kim, but thanks.
August 10th, 2010 at 1:35 am
@Kyle: you said it. That’s a really misappropriated title if I ever saw one. :p
–Doug (not a Chopra fan by any stretch)
August 12th, 2010 at 10:31 am
Hey, look at that! A Worst Horse moment in the “Post Comments” section.