Ah, Deepak Chopra. Seems most people love him or hate him.
There’s got to be a middle way!
…The other day we posted a Dharma-Burger item about Deepak’s new “Buddha” comic book, which is coming out soon through Virgin Comics and was developed with his son Gotham. It’s actually one of several stories that Chopra & Son are developing to bring Indian mythology to the world of comix.
The item was sent with a fairly mocking tone by one of the Horse’s readers. That’s cool — he’s got an opinion, and ain’t nothin’ wrong with that. And he’s not alone in thinking that old D.C. is dubious. Chopra may be considered a media heavyweight — what with his zillions of books, his Sirius radio show, and all the other concerns that make up the Deepak Empire. But many in the Buddhist world think of him as a lightweight. He’s a dabbler. A dilettante. He oversimplifies things. Or so the litany goes.
Maybe that’s all true. I personally have never been attracted enough to his approach to actually read one of his books. But I have checked out an interview or two, so it’s not like I have absolutely no idea what he’s about. And last night I got a welcome additional bit of perspective, thanks to the Sundance Channel’s consistently great show, Iconoclasts.
The device of Iconoclasts is that it follows a day shared between two surprisingly like-minded celebrities or otherwise-notables. One pairing from last season, for example, was Dave Chappelle and Maya Angelou. The episode currently running is one featuring Deepak Chopra and… comedian Mike Myers. That’s right:
“Party on, Wayne!”
“Party on, Deepak!”
If you’ve been visiting the Horse for a while this pairing may not come as a total surprise. About a year ago we ran a Link of the Moment that brought readers to a story about Myers’ slightly controversial project, The Love Guru, which was described by Radar as Myers’ “latest racial romp,” featuring his character, the “Dharma” teacher Guru Pitka.
It turns out that, as with most things Myers parodies, this “Dharma” teacher is considered worthy of long hours in the makeup chair not because he represents something that the comedian wishes to belittle, but instead because he represents something that he’s fascinated with. (The incredibly silly Austin Powers films, you may recall, were made in homage to Myers’ dad and the love that both father and son had for British comedy and James Bond films.)
In the Iconoclasts episode, Myers relates that his father’s death started him on a sort of spiritual quest wherein he became interested in “higher states of consciousness,” and started reading Chopra’s books. That is, he started dabbling.
Now, I’m not going to pretend that I can even begin to judge Chopra’s legitimacy as a scholar — though watching him interact with Myers, he did seem to have a lot more off-hand knowledge and general commitment to what he does that many might think. He also seemed to be downright likable and even funny. One thing that’s clear about Deepak is this: scholar or no, he’s the dabbler’s Pied Piper. He delivers his messages about health, spirituality, God, and meditation in a way that’s as simple as can be.
And that’s cool.
Why is that cool? Because you have to start somewhere, and we all, pretty much, start out as dabblers. Example: let’s say you’re a Buddhist (which you may very well be if you’re reading this). Think back to what got you interested in the Dharma. For many people, a major, heavy life event is a big part of what prods them onto the path. That may have been true for you, but it’s not unlikely that something else played a role: Buddhism’s message had somehow been, in one way or another, delivered to you in a way that you could understand enough to want to know more. It might have been a very clear book with a funky, surprising title. It might have been a piece of art, anything from an intricate Buddha statue to an arresting piece of Dharma-graffiti on the street. Hell, it might have even been seeing The Matrix. It’s all okay, as long it helps you to start taking a good, clear look at the content and potential of your mind. Whatever works.
For Mike Myers, what worked was what Deepak Chopra had to say. Maybe he does oversimplify things sometimes. But Chopra’s massive success indicates that what he’s doing does in fact work on at least an introductory level, and it’s cool that there’s someone out there who’s so skilled at talking about the things he talks about in such a clear and friendly way. You may scoff at his recent novel, in which he fictionalized the Buddha’s life, or at his attempt to do the same in comic-book form. But here’s the thing: these things will be bought and read by people who might have never even considered buying anything like them. If they seem too lightweight for you, that’s because they are too lightweight — for you.
But Chopra’s Buddha comic book (for example) could turn out to be, for some, the first dipping of their toes into the stream of Dharma. (It’s not a stretch to imagine a young comix fan reading it and deciding that he or she would like to know more.) And should these folks choose to go deeper, they’ll find that there’s a boundless universe of Dharma teachers, teachings, and scholars out there just waiting for them — each potentially perfect for every new moment and question that arises in their lives.
Some — many, of course — will not choose to go deeper, much to less dive in. But when it comes to the Dharma, it’s better to have dipped your toes into the stream just once than to have never even been told that it’s there.
Isn’t it?
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
February 4th, 2008 at 3:06 am
Hi, Here are some thoughts to share on Chopra’s portrayal of Buddhism…
Popularising New Dogma on the Buddha? :
http://www.moonpointer.com/index.php?itemid=1499
February 4th, 2008 at 7:36 pm
I agree with you totally man. I thoroughly enjoyed the Iconoclast episode, and while he may have over-simplified things, someone people need it that way. Myself for one. The technical jargon goes way over my head, tell me like it is and I’ll understand it. That’s why I enjoy alot of the younger teachers out there like Noah Levine and Ethan Nichtern, they try their best not to candy coat the Dharma. I respect Deepak deeply, his is truly worthy of the “Icon” status Sundance has given him. In my business meeting this past week, a “stuffed shirt” was even talking about him. So maybe he is talking to people in a way others don’t. I’m not sure, but I dig him! And I’d love to see this comic idea come to fruition.
February 5th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
I was in a Vajrasattva empowerment a few months ago with a Dharma Punk friend of mine–straight up Goenka Vipassana kid–question everything, stay with the breath, the awareness, and the basic suttas. We got to a pretty weird point in the whole ritual and the Lama pretty much stops the process to explain that this is the “secret” part…and that you don’t have to do it. You can get off the bus before we go way into the weird weird world of Nyigma Tantra. But don’t worry, it won’t hurt you at all.
My friend got off the bus but sat and watched and his face said it all: “WTF!!!??? THIS isn’t Buddhism!?! What are you nut jobs doing??” And I’m thinking, “this is really weird…but it’s kinda cool. I get tantra!” I put my lips to the half of a human skull and drank the “nectar.”
So I’m not saying that Vajrayana is better than Vipassana or anything…I don’t like that fight…I feel like it makes the tathagatas wipe a tear from their eyes and think “poor silly beings.”
But I will say that different people get on and off the bus at different places. The blessing, at least in the tradition that I practice, is to be born in a time and place to be introduced to the Dharma and allowed to practice. Introduced…and then practice. When you make the jump from introduced to practice…you make the jump from comic books, or Herman Hesse, to teachers and lineages.
We’re just such “experts” on everything in America…we tend toward fundamentalism as much as anyone really…and yet we are awash in all three turnings of the wheel of Dharma and are busy coming up with our own American version. What a mess. In nearly twenty years of studying Buddhism and ten years of practice…I’ve found that it always comes back to the basics that the Buddha taught. Hell, people who have never even heard of the Buddha have come to the same conclusions. I’m not worried for the souls of the misled…and I’m not about to run Deepak out of town for making a movie that isn’t as good as the book. And I bet he knows waaaaaaaay more about a lot of things than I do and doesn’t tell.
Noah Levine was in my town the other night and I went to see him. Someone asked me how it was.
I told them he always says the same things on nights like that…it was the introductory talk. I just went to see Noah because I like him. I just like to sit with him…the talk is for other people.
February 5th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Some of the talk regarding Deepak and Dharma-dabbling has moved here:
http://www.moonpointer.com/index.php?itemid=1499
Do check it out, and leave a comment there — or, here!
April 6th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
[...] Sure, that’s a given. But then again, it’s clear that with so many traditions having their own presentations of the legend, Chopra’s not exactly being so cavalier as some purists will say. That being said, there’s something weird about the full title of the comic book, isn’t there? It’s “Deepak Chopra’s Buddha (TM): A Story of Enlightenment.” (For more of this kind of thing, see the Horse’s February 08 piece, “In Defense of Deepak and Dharma-Dabbling.” [...]
May 27th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
[...] all of his fame and fortune, he seems to have a lot of detractors in the otherwise often-innovative Dharma-world. His recent fictionalized biography, Buddha, seems [...]
June 20th, 2008 at 7:26 pm
[...] you’re a return reader of the Horse, you know I’m not on the Deepak-bashing bandwagon. I like him; the world – the Dharma – needs guys like him, too. I always thought the reasons [...]